⭐本专栏旨在对Python的基础语法进行详解，精炼地总结语法中的重点，详解难点，面向零基础及入门的学习者，通过专栏的学习可以熟练掌握python编程，同时为后续的数据分析，机器学习及深度学习的代码能力打下坚实的基础。
🔥本文已收录于Python基础系列专栏： Python基础系列教程 欢迎订阅，持续更新。
🔥文章和代码已归档至【Github仓库】，需要的朋友们自取。或者关注公众号【AIShareLab】，回复 python基础 也可获取。
文章目录
14.1 Python之禅
import this
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Readability counts.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
- Beautiful is better than ugly
整齐、易读胜过混乱、晦涩
- Simple is better than complex
简约胜过复杂
- Complex is better than complicated
复杂胜过晦涩
- Flat is better than nested
扁平胜过嵌套
-
Now is better than never.
-
Although never is often better than right now.
理解一：先行动起来，编写行之有效的代码，不要企图一开始就编写完美无缺的代码
理解二：做比不做要好，但是盲目的不加思考的去做还不如不做
- If the implementation is hard to explain, it’s a bad idea.
- If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
如果方案很难解释，很可能不是有一个好的方案，反之亦然
一些感悟
1、首先要行动起来，编写行之有效的代码；
2、如果都能解决问题，选择更加简单的方案；
3、整齐、易读、可维护性、可扩展性好；
4、强壮、健壮、鲁棒性好；
5、响应速度快，占用空间少。
有些时候，鱼和熊掌不可兼得，根据实际情况进行相应的取舍
14.2 时间复杂度分析
14.2.1 代数分析
求最大值和排序
import numpy as np
x = np.random.randint(100, size=10)
x
array([13, 14, 33, 79, 18, 26, 17, 65, 87, 63])
-
寻找最大值的时间复杂度为O(n)
-
选择排序时间复杂度O(n^2)
代数分析
def one(x):
"""常数函数"""
return np.ones(len(x))
def log(x):
"""对数函数"""
return np.log(x)
def equal(x):
"""线性函数"""
return x
def n_logn(x):
"""nlogn函数"""
return x*np.log(x)
def square(x):
"""平方函数"""
return x**2
def exponent(x):
"""指数函数"""
return 2**x
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.style.use("seaborn-whitegrid")
t = np.linspace(1, 20, 100)
methods = [one, log, equal, n_logn, square, exponent]
method_labels = ["$y = 1$", "$y = log(x)$", "$y = x$", "$y = xlog(x)$", "$y = x^2$", "$y = 2^x$"]
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6))
for method, method_label in zip(methods, method_labels):
plt.plot(t, method(t), label=method_label, lw=3)
plt.xlim(1, 20)
plt.ylim(0, 40)
plt.legend()
<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x22728098e80>
我们的最爱：常数函数和对数函数
勉强接受：线性函数和nlogn函数
难以承受：平方函数和指数函数
14.2.2 三集不相交问题
问题描述：
假设有A、B、C三个序列，任一序列内部没有重复元素，欲知晓三个序列交集是否为空
import random
def creat_sequence(n):
A = random.sample(range(1, 1000), k=n)
B = random.sample(range(1000, 2000), k=n)
C = random.sample(range(2000, 3000), k=n)
return A, B, C
A, B, C = creat_sequence(100)
def no_intersection_1(A, B, C):
for a in A:
for b in B:
for c in C:
if a == b == c:
return False
return True
%timeit no_intersection_1(A, B, C)
no_intersection_1(A, B, C)
36.7 ms ± 2.12 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
True
def no_intersection_2(A, B, C):
for a in A:
for b in B:
if a == b: # 如果相等再进行遍历，否则就返回上一级
for c in C:
if a == c:
return False
return True
%timeit no_intersection_2(A, B, C)
301 µs ± 37.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
import time
res_n_3 = []
res_n_2 = []
for n in [10, 20, 100]:
A, B, C = creat_sequence(n)
start_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
no_intersection_1(A, B, C)
end_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
no_intersection_2(A, B, C)
end_2 = time.time()
res_n_3.append(str(round((end_1 - start_1)*1000))+"ms")
res_n_2.append(str(round((end_2 - end_1)*1000))+"ms")
print("{0:<23}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("方法", "n=10", "n=20", "n=100"))
print("{0:<25}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("no_inte rsection_1", *res_n_3))
print("{0:<25}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("no_intersection_2", *res_n_2))
方法 n=10 n=20 n=100
no_inte rsection_1 6ms 42ms 4001ms
no_intersection_2 0ms 1ms 24ms
14.2.3 元素唯一性问题
问题描述：A 中的元素是否唯一
def unique_1(A):
for i in range(len(A)):
for j in range(i+1, len(A)):
if A[i] == A[j]:
return False
return True
def unique_2(A):
A_sort = sorted(A)
for i in range(len(A_sort)-1):
if A[i] == A[i+1]:
return False
return True
时间复杂度为O(nlogn)
import random
res_n_2 = []
res_n_log_n = []
for n in [100, 1000]:
A = list(range(n))
random.shuffle(A)
start_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
unique_1(A)
end_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
unique_2(A)
end_2 = time.time()
res_n_2.append(str(round((end_1 - start_1)*1000))+"ms")
res_n_log_n.append(str(round((end_2 - end_1)*1000))+"ms")
print("{0:<13}{1:<15}{2:<15}".format("方法", "n=100", "n=1000"))
print("{0:<15}{1:<15}{2:<15}".format("unique_1", *res_n_2))
print("{0:<15}{1:<15}{2:<15}".format("unique_2", *res_n_log_n))
方法 n=100 n=1000
unique_1 49ms 4044ms
unique_2 1ms 21ms
14.2.4 第n个斐波那契数
a(n+2) = a(n+1) + a(n)
def bad_fibonacci(n):
if n <= 1:
return n
else:
return bad_fibonacci(n-2)+ bad_fibonacci(n-1)
O(2^n)
def good_fibonacci(n):
i, a, b = 0, 0, 1
while i < n:
a, b = b, a+b
i += 1
return a
3
O(n)
%timeit bad_fibonacci(10)
20.6 µs ± 1.15 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)
%timeit good_fibonacci(10)
875 ns ± 24.5 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
14.2.5 最大盛水容器
暴力求解——双循环
def max_area_double_cycle(height):
"""暴力穷举双循环"""
i_left, i_right, max_area = 0,0,0
for i in range(len(height)-1):
for j in range(i+1, len(height)):
area = (j-i) * min(height[j], height[i])
if area > max_area:
i_left, i_right, max_area = i, j, area
return i_left, i_right, max_area
height = np.random.randint(1, 50, size=10)
print(height)
max_area_double_cycle(height)
[10 11 41 26 2 44 26 43 36 30]
(2, 8, 216)
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.bar(range(10), height, width=0.5)
plt.xticks(range(0, 10, 1))
([<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728e01b00>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x227289ce518>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728e01358>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f38c50>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f38b00>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f4f4a8>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f4f978>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f4fe48>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f60358>,
<matplotlib.axis.XTick at 0x22728f60828>],
<a list of 10 Text xticklabel objects>)
双向指针
def max_area_bothway_points(height):
"""双向指针法"""
i = 0
j = len(height)-1
i_left, j_right, max_area=0, 0, 0
while i < j:
area = (j-i) * min(height[i], height[j])
if area > max_area:
i_left, j_right, max_area = i, j, area
if height[i] == min(height[i], height[j]):
i += 1
else:
j -= 1
return i_left, j_right, max_area
max_area_bothway_points(height)
(2, 8, 216)
double_cycle = []
bothway_points = []
for n in [5, 50, 500]:
height = np.random.randint(1, 50, size=n)
start_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
max_area_double_cycle(height)
end_1 = time.time()
for i in range(100):
max_area_bothway_points(height)
end_2 = time.time()
double_cycle.append(str(round((end_1 - start_1)*1000))+"ms")
bothway_points.append(str(round((end_2 - end_1)*1000))+"ms")
print("{0:<15}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("方法", "n=5", "n=50", "n=500"))
print("{0:<13}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("暴力循环", *double_cycle))
print("{0:<13}{1:<15}{2:<15}{3:<15}".format("双向指针", *bothway_points))
方法 n=5 n=50 n=500
暴力循环 3ms 97ms 7842ms
双向指针 2ms 8ms 56ms
14.2.6 是不是时间复杂度低就一定好?
不一定，试比较100000 VS 0.00001
14.2.7 影响运算速度的因素
- 硬件
- 软件
- 算法
文章出处登录后可见！
已经登录？立即刷新
